Force Majeure and Frustration of a Contract

The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has had significant repercussions on both human life and industry. COVID-19 has also severely impacted business operations and contracts. The status quo has been disrupted, adversely affecting the supply chain, causing delays, interruptions, or cancellations of contracts. In such scenarios, contractual obligations need to be addressed with consideration of the clauses of force majeure and/or frustration of a contract. This article aims to explain the terms ‘force majeure’ and ‘frustration of a contract’ within the context of contractual agreements.

Understanding Force Majeure in Contracts

The term ‘force majeure’ refers to unavoidable circumstances that hinder a party from fulfilling a contract. Interestingly, the term is not explicitly defined in Indian law. However, relevant provisions can be found in section 32 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. This section states that if the contract's fulfillment depends on an event that becomes impossible, the contract becomes void.

Typically, a force majeure clause in a contract offers temporary relief when a force majeure event occurs. Commonly, events like acts of God, government actions, wars, earthquakes, and fires are considered force majeure events in contracts. These events need to be beyond the parties' control, inevitable/unforeseeable, and make contract execution wholly impossible.

When a force majeure event occurs, the affected party usually must formally notify the other party, intimating them of the event and the invocation of the clause. Activation often results in two possibilities:

The affected party is relieved from performing their contractual obligation as long as the event continues.
Parties may terminate the contract if the event persists for an extended period.

If the event does not fall under the force majeure clause, the affected party might consider invoking the ‘frustration of contracts’ clause, covered under section 56 of the Indian Contract Act. This is explained below.

The Doctrine of Frustration in Contracts

The frustration of a contract, also known as the ‘doctrine of frustration’, is governed by section 56 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. It refers to circumstances that arise after a contract is formed and are beyond a promiser’s control, rendering contract performance reasonably impossible. When invoked, the contract is voided, and all contractual obligations cease.

Comparing Force Majeure and Frustration of Contract

Force Majeure	Frustration of Contract
Event-specific clauses pre-anticipate force majeure events at contract execution.	Linked to unanticipated events at the time of contract execution.
Relieves obligations during the force majeure event period.	Renders the entire contract void.
First applied when unforeseen events occur.	Relied upon if no force majeure clause exists or is inapplicable.

Force Majeure and Frustration of Contract in the Context of COVID-19

In February 2020, the Ministry of Finance in India clarified that the supply chain disruption due to COVID-19, particularly from China or any affected country, may be considered a natural calamity, thereby allowing invocation of the force majeure clause. However, this early clarification was specific to supply chain disruptions. Thus, the terms of each contract are crucial for the invocation of the force majeure provision during the pandemic.

If invoking the force majeure provision is not feasible or the contract lacks such a clause, the affected party might resort to the doctrine of frustration. This ensures that parties have a mechanism to manage unforeseen impossibilities in contracts.

For those involved in industries affected by such clauses, understanding these distinctions is critical. Further detailed guidelines and government ordinances concerning contracts and business operations during the pandemic era can be accessed at Proprietorship ITR Filing Mysuru and other legal resources.

For more industry-specific insights, you may refer to the Rural Postal Life Insurance guide to understand how these legal frameworks can interact with your current business strategies.

Back to Learn

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Force Majeure and Frustration of Contract.

Force majeure refers to unforeseen circumstances that prevent someone from fulfilling their contractual obligations. It describes events beyond the control of the parties involved in a contract that make the performance of the contract impossible or impractical.

No, the term 'force majeure' has neither been defined nor dealt with specifically in Indian law. However, Section 32 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, provides relevant provisions regarding the impossibility of performing a contract due to unforeseen events.

Common events covered as force majeure events in contracts include acts of God, acts of government, war, earthquakes, fire, and other natural calamities or events beyond the parties' control. The contract usually includes an exhaustive list of events defined as force majeure events.

To invoke a force majeure clause, the following requirements must be met: (1) the occurrence of the event should be beyond the control of the parties, (2) the cause of the event must be inevitable/unforeseeable, and (3) the cause of the event makes the execution of the contract wholly impossible.

When a force majeure clause is invoked, the affected party is typically relieved from performing their contractual obligations during the period the force majeure event continues. In some cases, the parties may be permitted to terminate the contract if the force majeure event persists for an extended period.

The 'frustration of contract' doctrine, covered under Section 56 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, refers to a set of circumstances that arise after the formation of a contract, which are beyond the parties' control and render the performance of the contract reasonably impossible. In such cases, the contract becomes void, and all contractual obligations cease to exist.

The key difference is that force majeure events are pre-anticipated and listed in the contract, while the frustration of contract applies to unforeseen events not covered in the contract. Additionally, invoking force majeure temporarily relieves the party from obligations, while frustration of contract renders the entire contract void.

The Ministry of Finance in India has clarified that the disruption of supply chains due to the COVID-19 outbreak in China or other countries should be considered a case of natural calamity, and the force majeure clause may be invoked. However, the applicability of the force majeure clause depends on the specific terms of the contract.

If a contract does not have a force majeure clause, and the invocation of the force majeure provision is not possible, the affected party may take shelter under the doctrine of frustration covered in Section 56 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

Having a well-drafted force majeure clause in a contract is crucial as it provides temporary relief to the parties in case of unforeseen events beyond their control. The clause should clearly define the events that constitute force majeure and the consequences of invoking the clause, such as suspension or termination of the contract.